<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Nerdiest Place on Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonswett.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonswett.net</link>
	<description>A Blog About Software Development, Databases, And Stuff That Doesn&#039;t Have To Do With Computers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Niki at the beach by Kimberly Cizmar</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/niki-at-the-beach/comment-page-1/#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Cizmar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 12:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/?p=933#comment-457</guid>
		<description>Nice, Niki looks better pregnant in a bikini than I do un-preggers :( 
James and I are going to be in Chicago/Northwest Indiana July2nd-7th (ish).  I know you&#039;re in Michigan but if you can spare some time to hang out with some douchebags we&#039;d love it.  And congrats on the beautiful girlfriend and upcoming Filthy-Baby-J :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, Niki looks better pregnant in a bikini than I do un-preggers :(<br />
James and I are going to be in Chicago/Northwest Indiana July2nd-7th (ish).  I know you&#8217;re in Michigan but if you can spare some time to hang out with some douchebags we&#8217;d love it.  And congrats on the beautiful girlfriend and upcoming Filthy-Baby-J :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Niki at the beach by Nelly Blythe</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/niki-at-the-beach/comment-page-1/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelly Blythe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/?p=933#comment-450</guid>
		<description>That is a *beautiful* baby belly. Must&#039;ve been taken with your teeny little camera, seeing as how I still have your SLR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a *beautiful* baby belly. Must&#8217;ve been taken with your teeny little camera, seeing as how I still have your SLR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inheritance with symfony and Doctrine ORM by David</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/inheritance-with-symfony-and-doctrine-orm/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/blog/?p=263#comment-398</guid>
		<description>What I&#039;d like to find is a method of having the objects so that the common values are in the parent table and only the sub-class specific columns are in a separate table (that is handled auto-magically, as that is what I am doing by hand currently).

cow (purpose) -&gt; farm_animal (name, sound, leg_count)
milk_cow (quantity) -&gt; cow (purpose) -&gt; farm_animal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I&#8217;d like to find is a method of having the objects so that the common values are in the parent table and only the sub-class specific columns are in a separate table (that is handled auto-magically, as that is what I am doing by hand currently).</p>
<p>cow (purpose) -&gt; farm_animal (name, sound, leg_count)<br />
milk_cow (quantity) -&gt; cow (purpose) -&gt; farm_animal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inheritance with symfony and Doctrine ORM by Prasad</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/inheritance-with-symfony-and-doctrine-orm/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/blog/?p=263#comment-349</guid>
		<description>Agree with Kev.
Concrete Inheritance is used primarily for different entities of the same parent class

example 1: types of &#039;people&#039;: user, agent, admin, supplier contact, customer contact, employee

example 2: options (name, value): gender, phone-type, account types, dept codes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Kev.<br />
Concrete Inheritance is used primarily for different entities of the same parent class</p>
<p>example 1: types of &#8216;people&#8217;: user, agent, admin, supplier contact, customer contact, employee</p>
<p>example 2: options (name, value): gender, phone-type, account types, dept codes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inheritance with symfony and Doctrine ORM by Kev</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/inheritance-with-symfony-and-doctrine-orm/comment-page-1/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 18:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/blog/?p=263#comment-263</guid>
		<description>The key advantage I found with using the column aggregation is that you can use dql to query the parent table and then get back the child objects. This will hopefully come in real handy on a project I&#039;m working on where there&#039;s a public timeline of actions and when I query get the last 20 actions I only need to query one table and every entry in the timeline can have it&#039;s own individual ID</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key advantage I found with using the column aggregation is that you can use dql to query the parent table and then get back the child objects. This will hopefully come in real handy on a project I&#8217;m working on where there&#8217;s a public timeline of actions and when I query get the last 20 actions I only need to query one table and every entry in the timeline can have it&#8217;s own individual ID</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Food Near You search just got smarter by Improved search, new sellers on Food Near You &#171; The Nerdiest Place on Earth</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/food-near-you-search-just-got-smarter/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Improved search, new sellers on Food Near You &#171; The Nerdiest Place on Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 14:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/?p=801#comment-260</guid>
		<description>[...] few days ago I announced that I had improved the FNY search. One of the half-measures of the improved search was that if you wanted to search for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days ago I announced that I had improved the FNY search. One of the half-measures of the improved search was that if you wanted to search for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A dream I had last night by Tanner Swett</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/a-retarded-dream-i-had-last-night/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanner Swett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 17:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/?p=857#comment-251</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what she said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what she said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A dream I had last night by stella</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/a-retarded-dream-i-had-last-night/comment-page-1/#comment-248</link>
		<dc:creator>stella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 11:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/?p=857#comment-248</guid>
		<description>why did you need to use the word retarded?  retarded doesn&#039;t mean stupid.  when you use it you mock people with disabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why did you need to use the word retarded?  retarded doesn&#8217;t mean stupid.  when you use it you mock people with disabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Inheritance with symfony and Doctrine ORM by Raphael</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/inheritance-with-symfony-and-doctrine-orm/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Raphael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 21:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/blog/?p=263#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Good post!

I agree with the conclusion that concrete inheritance mode is the best one among the three. But the mileage may vary depending on the specific need and circumstances.

I wish to add the issue with concrete inheritance which nini has just raised. Even the concrete inheritance mode is not complete enough for the needs of true object-oriented logic: although there exists a top-level table farm_animal, this table will always be empty. The dogs, cows and chicken are exclusively stored in their respective tables, and none of them at all in the base class table. This arrangement is unlucky, as it inhibits browsing and quering through _all_ FarmAnimals, no matter which their (sub-)class is.
So e.g. it is not possible to search for an animal called &quot;Rosa&quot;, without knowing whether Rosa is a dog or a cow.
And more importantly, as nini is stating, you can&#039;t setup an association between FarmAnimal and e.g. Farm (&quot;a farm has zero, one or more animals&quot;).

Doctrine 2.0 may sometimes offer true full inheritance functionality by introducing &quot;table inheritance&quot;. That mode should avoid any redundancy (no same field exists in multiple tables) and then have the base class&#039; table store its part of each object, now allowing queries to be made on FarmAnimal level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post!</p>
<p>I agree with the conclusion that concrete inheritance mode is the best one among the three. But the mileage may vary depending on the specific need and circumstances.</p>
<p>I wish to add the issue with concrete inheritance which nini has just raised. Even the concrete inheritance mode is not complete enough for the needs of true object-oriented logic: although there exists a top-level table farm_animal, this table will always be empty. The dogs, cows and chicken are exclusively stored in their respective tables, and none of them at all in the base class table. This arrangement is unlucky, as it inhibits browsing and quering through _all_ FarmAnimals, no matter which their (sub-)class is.<br />
So e.g. it is not possible to search for an animal called &#8220;Rosa&#8221;, without knowing whether Rosa is a dog or a cow.<br />
And more importantly, as nini is stating, you can&#8217;t setup an association between FarmAnimal and e.g. Farm (&#8220;a farm has zero, one or more animals&#8221;).</p>
<p>Doctrine 2.0 may sometimes offer true full inheritance functionality by introducing &#8220;table inheritance&#8221;. That mode should avoid any redundancy (no same field exists in multiple tables) and then have the base class&#8217; table store its part of each object, now allowing queries to be made on FarmAnimal level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Food Near You by Food Near You search just got smarter &#171; The Nerdiest Place on Earth</title>
		<link>http://jasonswett.net/food-near-you/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Food Near You search just got smarter &#171; The Nerdiest Place on Earth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonswett.net/?p=789#comment-231</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with Food Near You, see this post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with Food Near You, see this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
